Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(21): e25645, 2021 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190994

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Since December 2019, pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), namely 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has rapidly spread from Wuhan city to other cities across China. The present study was designed to describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of 74 hospitalized patients with COVID-19.Clinical data of 74 COVID-19 patients were collected to analyze the epidemiological, demographic, laboratory, radiological, and treatment data. Thirty-two patients were followed up and tested for the presence of the viral nucleic acid and by pulmonary computed tomography (CT) scan at 7 and 14 days after they were discharged.Among all COVID-19 patients, the median incubation period for patients and the median period from symptom onset to admission was all 6 days; the median length of hospitalization was 13 days. Fever symptoms were presented in 83.78% of the patients, and the second most common symptom was cough (74.32%), followed by fatigue and expectoration (27.03%). Inflammatory indicators, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) of the intensive care unit (ICU) patients were significantly higher than that of the non-ICU patients (P < .05). However, 50.00% of the ICU patients had their the ratio of T helper cells to cytotoxic T cells (CD4/CD8) ratio lower than 1.1, whose proportion is much higher than that in non-ICU patients (P < .01).Compared with patients in Wuhan, COVID-19 patients in Anhui Province seemed to have milder symptoms of infection, suggesting that there may be some regional differences in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between different cities.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Tos/epidemiología , Fiebre/epidemiología , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , China/epidemiología , Ciudades/epidemiología , Tos/sangre , Tos/terapia , Tos/virología , Femenino , Fiebre/sangre , Fiebre/terapia , Fiebre/virología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Geografía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto Joven
2.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 24: 45-47, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-969589

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have reported high antibiotic use in patients hospitalised for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulting in concerns of increasing antimicrobial resistance with increase antibiotic use in this pandemic. Point prevalence survey (PPS) can be a quick tool to provide antibiotic prescribing information to aid antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities. OBJECTIVES: To describe antibiotic utilization and evaluate antibiotic appropriateness in COVID-19 patients using PPS. METHODS: Adapting Global-PPS on antimicrobial use, the survey was conducted in COVID-19 wards at 2 centres in Singapore on 22 April 2020 at 0800h. Patients on systemic antibiotics were included and evaluated for antibiotic appropriateness. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-seven patients were screened. Thirty-six (6.2%) patients were on antibiotics and which were started at median of 7 days (inter-quartile rate (IQR), 4, 11) from symptom onset. Fifty-one antibiotics were prescribed in these patients. Overall, co-amoxiclav (26/51, 51.0%) was the most often prescribed antibiotic. Thirty-one out of 51 (60.8%) antibiotic prescriptions were appropriate. Among 20 inappropriate prescriptions, 18 (90.0%) were initiated in patients with low likelihood of bacterial infections. Antibiotic prescriptions were more appropriate when reviewed by infectious diseases physicians (13/31 [41.9%] versus 2/20 [10.0%], p=0.015), and if reasons for use were stated in notes (31/31 [100.0%] versus 16/20 [80.0%], p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Despite low prevalence of antibiotic use among confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients at 2 centres in Singapore, there was significant proportion of inappropriate antibiotics use where bacterial infections were unlikely. AMS teams can tailor stewardship strategies using PPS results.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/microbiología , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/virología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Singapur/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA